Sunday, July 26, 2009

Constitutional Crisis Looming, Scofflow Obama has History with Cambridge Police, ACORN criminally investigated

1) Daily Presidential Tracking Poll The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows that 29% of the nation's voters now Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty percent (40%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -11. That’s the first time his ratings have reached double digits in negative territory. … Fifty-three percent (53%) now oppose the Congressional health care reform package. That’s up eight points over the past month. Just 20% now see health care as the most important of the President’s priorities. See: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll 2) Constitutional crisis looming? The inflammatory issue of Barrack Obama’s birth certificate is gathering steam across America: Was he or was he not born in the United States? If he was born anywhere other than on American soil, then his presidency is invalidated. Why? The Constitution of the United States pointedly requires that the President be a natural born citizen. Defusing the issue would be easy: Obama could simply provide a legitimate and complete birth certificate proving his birth location. Not only has he stubbornly refused to do so, but he has spent several million dollars in legal fees to thwart various citizen lawsuits that demand proper disclosure. Obama has also legally cloaked records that could potentially support or discredit his citizenship claims, like school records and transcripts from Harvard and Occidental College. Some investigators suspect that he may have applied for admission as a foreign student. ...Barrack Obama’s approval rating is already dropping like a rock and the public is more sharply polarized than ever. After just six months in office, Obama has fared worse than even Jimmy Carter in 1976, whose outrageous acts had enraged the American public like none before him. Carter had no chance of serving a second term. Many Democrats have already pulled away from Obama, fearing that he is a) too far to the left or b) pur­suing a narcissistic agenda that leaves them out of the picture. ...Perhaps Obama was convinced by his handlers that nobody would care about this natural born citizen thing. Or, per­haps they convinced him that he could get away with it even if they did care. What Obama may not know is that these same handlers might soon offer him up as a cheap sacrifice in order to force a Constitutional crisis. Why? Because it would almost certainly require a Constitutional Convention to straighten out the mess. Every Presi­dential act would be invalidated. Civil unrest would be rampant. Chaos would reign, and chaos is the desired envi­ronment for the powers behind Obama. With every passing day that the birth issue is not resolved in Obama’s favor, the odds will persistently increase that a Constitutional crisis will soon unfold, and that America will be polarized like never before in history. See: http://www.augustforecast.com/2009/07/24/constitutional-crisis-looming/ 2a) Media Mischief, the Obama Eligibility Issue and the “Dispositive Fact” Last week, the media was forced into reporting on the Obama birth-certificate/eligibility issue. It had little choice because respected CNN Journalist Lou Dobbs had the audacity to suggest that Obama should produce his long-form birth certificate to put to rest the doubts of millions of Americans who believe Obama is not constitutionally eligible to serve as President. Immediately and predictably, much of the reporting from the main stream media was in the form of vicious attacks, seeking to discredit Mr. Dobbs and others looking for clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Obama is or is not a “Natural Born Citizen” entitling him to serve as President of the United States. Left-wing bloggers and those in the media who have been carry Obama’s water this past year circled the wagons, and calls that Lou Dobbs be fired rang out. I have to salute Lou Dobbs for his courage and sense of ethical responsibility in addressing this issue at all. Of all the CNN commentators, Lou Dobbs is the one who consistently tries to be fair to all sides. …It seems to me that if the facts are as Mr. Klein says, serious reporters and investigators would be turning over every stone to try to find the truth. Serious reporters would be going to Kenya; talking to administrators, faculty, and students at all the colleges Obama attended to discover if he talked about his birthplace, applied/registered as a foreign student or received aid as a foreign student; they'd be looking at his past travel and what passports he carried; and they would be seeking the information provided on Obama's Illinois Bar Application. One would think that an innocent person sitting in the Oval Office would quickly provide all information necessary to put to bed this troubling “eligibility issue”. Obama has not. (George Bush or Bill Clinton would have, I’m sure.) In fact, Obama has spend hundreds of thousands of dollars (some say 1 to 2 million) trying to keep the past hidden. Thank you, Lou Dobbs, for having the courage to ask the simple question - Where's the Birth Certificate? …As Obama says, “let me be clear”, one can be a Citizen and NOT be a "Natural Born Citizen."   The flip side of this coin - if Obama is found not to be a "Natural Born Citizen", it would be the "dispositive fact" that would determine the outcome of the “eligibility issue”. Obama could not be President. So, which type of “Citizen” is Obama? Real reporters would be turning over heaven and earth to find out. The American reporters are turning over heaven and earth to cover it up. See: http://www.australia.to/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=12881:media-mischief-the-obama-eligibility-issue-and-the-dispositive-fact-&catid=71:world-news&Itemid=201 3) What’s actually in that Health Care Bill? Here’s a blogger who read it and cited some of the more troublesome provisions: Page 50 Section 152 in HC bill: HC will be provided to ALL non US citizens, illegal or otherwise Page 58 HC Bill: Govt will have real-time access to individuals finances & a National ID Healthcard will be issued! Page 59 HC Bill lines 21-24: Govt will have direct access to you ur banks accounts for elective funds transfer. Page 65 Sec 164: is a payoff subsidized plan for retirees and their families in Unions & community organizations: (ACORN). Page 95 HC Bill Lines 8-18: The Govt will use groups i.e., ACORN & Americorps to sign up individuals for Govt HC plan. Page 124 lines 24-25 HC: No company can sue GOVT on price fixing. No "judicial review" against Govt Monopoly. Page 127 Lines 1-16 HC Bill: Doctors/ American Medical Association - The Govt will tell YOU what you can make! (salary) Page 145 Line 15-17: An Employer MUST auto enroll employees into public option plan. NO CHOICE! Page 126 Lines 22-25: Employers MUST pay for HC for part time employees AND their families. Page 149 Lines 16-24: ANY Employer with payroll 401k & above who does not provide public option pays 8% tax on all payroll. See: http://aneverydaypatriot.blogspot.com/2009/07/truth-about-obamas-health-care-plan.html And: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.+3200 for the actual text of the bill.  3a) Obama health-care claims disputed Even as President Obama delivered a prime-time sales pitch for his embattled health care reform plan Wednesday, basic facts about coverage, cost and who foots the bills remain in dispute and many of the president's favorite talking points are challenged not only by Republicans but also by independent fact-checkers.  For example, Mr. Obama promises that people who are happy with their current health insurance can keep it. That's a claim contradicted by Factcheck.org, a nonpartisan consumer advocacy group at the University of Pennsylvania's Annenberg Public Policy Center. …Mr. Obama also changed his tune on requiring individuals to buy insurance or pay a fine. He opposed that idea on the campaign trail but has warmed to the idea as it became an element of the package being drafted by Congress. See: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/23/sale-of-health-care-plan-doesnt-always-meet-the-fa/?feat=home_headlines 3b) GOP Not Allowed to Say 'Government-Run Healthcare RUSH: By the way, Connie Hair at Human Events reports that House Republicans... Get this: House Republicans are now barred by Democrats on the Franking Commission -- that's in charge of mail -- from saying "'government-run health care' in the communications with their constituents." They have to pay for the postage themselves if they want to be able to say "government-run health care." The Democrats on the Franking Commission have refused the Franking privilege, free mail to constituents, if they use the term "government-run health care." This is a perfect illustration of the authoritarian -- or as Mark Levin calls them, the statist. See: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_072409/content/01125104.guest.html And: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=32856 3c) Perry raises possibility of states' rights showdown with White House over healthcare AUSTIN — Gov. Rick Perry, raising the specter of a showdown with the Obama administration, suggested Thursday that he would consider invoking states’ rights protections under the 10th Amendment to resist the president’s healthcare plan, which he said would be "disastrous" for Texas. Interviewed by conservative talk show host Mark Davis of Dallas’ WBAP/820 AM, Perry said his first hope is that Congress will defeat the plan, which both Perry and Davis described as "Obama Care." But should it pass, Perry predicted that Texas and a "number" of states might resist the federal health mandate. "I think you’ll hear states and governors standing up and saying 'no’ to this type of encroachment on the states with their healthcare," Perry said. "So my hope is that we never have to have that stand-up. But I’m certainly willing and ready for the fight if this administration continues to try to force their very expansive government philosophy down our collective throats." See: http://www.star-telegram.com/804/story/1504240.html 3d) Dallas Tea-Party Crowd Ambushes MoveOn Rally RUSH: This is funny, too. This is from a blog in Dallas. "Local MoveOn.org members had penciled in on [yesterday's] schedule a protest in front of Senator John Cornyn's Spring Valley Road office, during which they had hoped to pressure the senator to support President Barack Obama's public health care legislation. But when Paula Anderson, a MoveOn.org member and spokeswoman, showed up at 11:30 a.m., she found another contingent had beat her to the proverbial punch: A large number of Dallas Tea Party members were already set up, voicing their opposition to the proposal," and this MoveOn.org babe "was stunned: 'We really did not expect them to show up.' She estimated the crowd at about 130. ...  "Tea Party-hearties also showed up to health-care legislation rallies in Austin and in San Antonio. ... Q Coleman, a Tea Party member, estimated the crowd swelled to at least 200. 'The vast majority of people here didn't want this,' Coleman said. 'We beat them 10 to 1,'" and the MoveOn.org babe said, "I'm just amazed they are so strong in what their beliefs are. With people being without health care, it's just hard to imagine people could be so against the plan Obama is trying to put in place." MoveOn.org was "stunned" that there is so much hardened opinion against the plan. The MoveOn.org people are idiots. They don't understand. This is not about insuring people that don't have health insurance. It's not about that at all. It's not even about health care. I'm blue in the face describing this. See: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_072409/content/01125104.guest.html And: http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2009/07/how_a_rally_for_obamas_health.php 3e) Did Michelle Obama start a patient-dumping program? While Barack Obama presses for health-care reform, Sean Hannity looks at his wife’s efforts to reform medical care at the University of Chicago Medical Center as its vice-president. In a lengthy segment on last night’s show, Hannity reports on the Urban Health Initiative, a program ostensibly intended to provide the kind of change in health care that President Obama says his program will deliver nationally — fewer emergency room vists, better wellness and prevention care, and lower costs. However, the people in Chicago see the UHI differently. In practice, it looks more like a patient-dumping scheme to avoid dealing with Medicare/Medicaid patients. …Sen. Barack Obama’s wife and three close advisers have been involved with a program at the University of Chicago Medical Center that steers patients who don’t have private insurance — primarily poor, black people — to other health care facilities. Michelle Obama — currently on unpaid leave from her $317,000-a-year job as a vice president of the prestigious hospital — helped create the program, which aims to find neighborhood doctors for low-income people who were flooding the emergency room for basic treatment. Hospital officials say such patients hinder their ability to focus on more critically ill patients in need of specialized care, such as cancer treatment and organ transplants. Obama’s top political strategist, David Axelrod, co-owns the firm, ASK Public Strategies, that was hired by the hospital last year to sell the program — called the Urban Health Initiative — to the community as a better alternative for poor patients. See: http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/23/video-did-michelle-obama-start-a-patient-dumping-program/ 4) The criminal case against ACORN Congressional report demands probe, block of $8.5 billion in stimulus funds In a move to block designation of $8.5 billion in economic stimulus funds, Republicans on a House committee released a report calling for a criminal investigation of ACORN, the community activist group tied to numerous charges of voter fraud nationwide.  The 88-page report asks whether ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, is intentionally structured as a criminal enterprise.  Commissioned by Rep. Darrell Issa of California, the ranking Republican on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, the report charges ACORN "hides behind a paper wall of nonprofit corporate protections to conceal a criminal conspiracy on the part of its directors, to launder federal money in order to pursue a partisan political agenda and to manipulate the American electorate." The report expresses concern that ACORN would channel $8.5 billion in economic stimulus funds through a criminal corporate structure designed to mask the distribution of public money to partisan activities, including voter fraud to advance the campaigns of radical Democratic politicians.  "It is undisputed that ACORN engages in politically partisan activity," the report declared, noting ACORN was paid $832,000 by the Obama 2008 presidential campaign for get-out-the-vote efforts. See: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104842 4a) ACORN files lawsuit on voter registration The liberal activist organization ACORN filed a lawsuit Wednesday that aims to strike down a Pennsylvania law that authorities are currently using to prosecute several of the group's former employees on charges related to voter-registration fraud.  The suit, filed in federal court in Pennsylvania, seeks to have a state law known as solicitation of registration declared unconstitutional. The law makes it illegal to pay an employee for soliciting voter registrations based on the number of registrations the employee obtains.  Five former employees of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) were charged in May with various voter-registration-fraud crimes, including solicitation of donations. Those charges, which authorities say included ACORN employees submitting registration forms for "Mickey Mouse," are still pending. See: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/23/acorn-files-lawsuit-on-voter-registration/?feat=home_headlines 5) Some Gitmo detainees may come to US jails WASHINGTON – The Pentagon's top lawyer said Friday that the Obama administration has not abandoned the possibility of transferring some prisoners from the Guantanamo Bay detention center to a prison in the United States despite strong congressional concerns. See: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090725/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_guantanamo_detainees 6) 'Scofflaw' Obama has history with 'stupid' Cambridge police Condemns action of officer at department that ticketed prez 17 times while a student President Obama, who targeted the Cambridge, Mass., police department with his comment that one of its officers acted "stupidly" in the arrest of a black man, has a history with the department dating from his college years to as recently as the launch of his presidential campaign. Gates, who contends he was racially profiled, said the door of his own rented home was jammed, and he and his driver were trying to force it open. Obama responded to a question about the case at a nationally televised news conference Wednesday.  "But I think it's fair to say, No. 1, any of us would be pretty angry," Obama said. "No. 2, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home. And No. 3 – what I think we know separate and apart from this incident – is that there is a long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately, and that's just a fact." The officer reported Gates was belligerent, followed him onto the home's front porch and screamed at him. Today, the local police officers union held a news conference to say there was no evidence the arrest was race-based …According to the Somerville Times in 2007, as a Harvard Law School student, Obama got 17 parking tickets during 1989-1991 from the Cambridge Police Department that he left unpaid until just weeks before he announced his bid for the presidency.  "In other words, as a practicing lawyer in Chicago, he allowed these tickets and penalties to remain unpaid; as an Illinois state senator he allowed these tickets and fines to remain unpaid; and as a United States senator he allowed these almost-two-decade-old signs of his disdain for the law to remain unpaid," commented John LeBoutillier on Newsmax.com.  The Washington Post said two years ago that the tickets included parking without a proper permit and parking in a bus stop. See: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104935 6a) Meet the man at center of Obama's race controversy Gates immortalized communist, linked to radical black activists JERUSALEM – Henry Louis Gates Jr., the Harvard professor at the center of the current national race controversy, has recruited radical black activists to his university department, is a prominent supporter of reparations for the descendents of slaves and has immortalized a communist and socialist activist.  Since 1991, Gates has been teaching African American studies at Harvard, where he serves as the director of the W. E. B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research. De Bois, an American civil rights activist, sociologist, historian and author, was an avowed communist and also a socialist sympathizer.  Du Bois was for a brief time a member of the Socialist Party. In 1927 he infamously traveled to the USSR, where he called the Soviet system "the most hopeful vehicle for the world." Eight years later, he published the book "Black Reconstruction," which offered a Marxist interpretation of the Reconstruction Era. … Serving as director for the Harvard institute immortalizing Du Bois, Gates cultivated black radicals to his race studies department, most prominently bringing in Cornel West, a controversial adviser on Louis Farrakhan's Million Man March with close ties to socialist and black extremist groups. West is a declared personal friend of Farrakhan. See: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104938 6b) Gates lawyer was young Obama's mentor Radical black activist tied to Black Panthers, supports reparations JERUSALEM – The lawyer representing Henry Louis Gates Jr., the Harvard professor at the center of a national race controversy, was a mentor of both Barack and Michelle Obama and served on the president's black advisory council.  Charles Ogletree Jr., himself a Harvard University professor, is closely linked to the Black Panthers and to radical black ideology. He is a key member of the reparations movement and once pursued the possibility of bringing a class action lawsuit to win reparations for descendants of African slaves. See: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104928

No comments:

Post a Comment